Exam dates 2018
EXAM DATES 2018
Paper 1 - 5 June 2018 am
Paper 2 - 8 June 2018 am
A2 Communication & Culture:
Wed 6 June 2018 am
Wednesday, 9 March 2016
AS Literature - revision notes on the poems
I stumbled across this English revision blog, which includes notes on the poems we are studying (written by students). You might find it useful - especially to catch up if you have missed a poem or two.
Thursday, 3 March 2016
Genetics - blog post by Lisa & Ailbhe
Genetics by
Sinead Morrissey
This poem talks about the
importance of marriage and the celebrated relationship between a mother and
father even though they have separated. It talks about how even though the parents
have separated; ‘the child’ is a representation of their marriage and love they
had once shared. The poem ends with the narrator speaking to who we believe is her
lover and she is telling him the importance of marriage.
One interpretation we made was
that the palms and hands were a metaphor for the mother and father’s
relationship. It is given the actions of repelling and also linking together. ‘They
may have been repelled to separate hands’/ ‘but in me they touch where fingers
link to palms’. To emphasise this, the poet refers to a children's game where
the hands are put together with the index fingertips touching, knuckles of the other
fingers touching, and the thumbs bent inwards. The index fingers, children are
told, represents the steeple or tower of the church, the knuckles the body of
the church and the folded thumbs the door. When turned over so the palms and
fingers are exposed, representing the contents of the church. "Here is the
church... here is the steeple... open the door... and here are all the people. ”
The third stanza shows us the opinions
of family members and friends who witnessed the coming together of the parents.
‘but friends who quarry for their image by a river’. This shows us that the
relative are searching and trying to remember the memories of the good times they shared ( photos, videos); “nothing
left of their togetherness but friends” – brings about the question of who’s
side do the couple’s friends go on?
The poem is a poem is a
Villanelle form which is very structured and has a strict rhyme scheme, 5
stanzas with 3 lines however the last stanza includes 4 lines. Stanza 1 to 5 is recognition of her parents’ marriage and
the last stanza gives us different approach as she is speaking to her lover. ‘
I’ll bequeath my fingers, if you bequeath your palms’. Rhyming words like words such as ‘palms’,
‘hands’ and ‘demands’ which may at first seem shaky (making them half rhymes),
however this helps to highlight that children are not carbon copies of their
parents, a direct link to the title. But that there is always a link despite
physical separation gives us different approach as she is speaking to her
lover. ‘I’ll bequeath my fingers, if you bequeath your palms’. The use of
repetition is repeated at the beginning of the poem and also at the end: ‘My
fathers in my hands, but my mothers in my palms.’ This shows us how close her
and her parents her even though they are not together.
Monday, 29 February 2016
Please Hold - blog post by Payal & Jess
‘Please Hold’
The literal meaning of ‘Please Hold’ is about a man who is
losing his patience when he is on the phone as he finds himself continuously
talking to a voice mail machine. He gets angrier by the minute yet his wife is
explaining to him this is the way things are nowadays. I think that the in
depth meaning of the poem is about the future and how it is expensive as
everything revolves around technology and this male speaker happens to be old
fashioned with his ways and has not accepted robots, machines and other sources
of technology; therefore, I think this poem is a way of him expressing his
worries and concerns about the future. He mimics the voice mail and all its
‘countless options’ but implies that with whatever answer you give it takes you
to a ‘dead end’ this creates the idea of voice mails being like mazes, which
shows that the speaker finds this new technology confusing.
The structure of this poem is very irregular. There are 2 stanzas
of which contain different amounts of lines. The first stanza is much longer
than the second it contains 50 lines whereas the final stanza contains only 3
lines. The long stanza could be to exaggerate how voice mails are long and
never ending just like the stanza. It could also show how passionate the writer
is about this topic. That he is so angry that he is continuously writing more
and his hate for technology is never-ending.
The language used in ‘Please Hold’ is informal as though it’s
spoken. For instance, ‘I’m talking to a robot’ suggests the speaker is
explaining the event to the reader. However, the reader can understand it’s
literally a mental rant. It’s more the tone that is significant as it’s
sarcastic using dry humour, common to this Irish poet. This tone may be to
emphasise how relatable the poem is and the point of this poem that the
evolution of technology reduces humanity.
He uses a lot of repetition perhaps to mimic the voice mail
as they often repeat themselves or also to show that he has heard these phrases
numerous times and has now memorised them. He often repeats the saying, ‘my
wife says, this is the future’; this could be to show that all he ever hears is
his wife telling him this is the future now because technology is improving day
by day and something new is invented everyday. He then compares the agent on
the phone to a robot. Implying that even if they passed the phone through to a
real person whatever they say will be scripted just like the robot. There is no
real conversation and once again he thinks that ‘this is the future’.
One important feature of this poem is the repetition of the
German phrase ‘Eine Kleine Nachtmusik’ (or ‘A Little Night Music’). It is a
popular piece of classical music by Mozart commonly used as ‘holding music’
when one is put on hold. The phrase is used to refer back to the title and the
main theme of the poem but also the repetition, and particularly the swearing
that breaks the last use of the phrase, is created to accentuate the irritation
of the speaker, written by the poet as though the reader is listening to the
music themselves.
As the exam will require comparing two poems, it is
important to discuss what poems can be linked with ‘Please Hold’. Clearly, one
possible link is ‘The Fox in the National Museum of Wales’ as both centre
around the approach of the future.
Another poem ‘Please Hold’ could be linked to is Barber’s ‘Material’ as both
speakers dislike the loss of humanity and the destruction technology causes.
However, both comparative poems lack the same structure as O’Driscoll’s ‘Please
Hold’. On a smaller note, a poem one could compare this poem to, in terms of
structure, is ‘Effects’ as both speakers express themselves in a conversational
manner and both have a irregular pattern- the rhyming of ‘Effects’ and the
repetition of ‘Please Hold’.
The Deliverer - blog post by Ellie & Emily
The Deliverer by Tishani Doshi
The title ‘The Deliverer’ arises many different
interpretations of what a deliverer could be associated with; some of the most
prominent ideas being hospitals, babies and prophets. These first impressions
help the reader formulate a prediction before reading the poem and in this case
allow us to understand the poem whilst we are reading it. Tishani Doshi used
‘The Deliverer’ to share a story of a young girl’s adoption and the
frequentness of this situation in her country. In some cultures a male baby is
much more valued than the birth of a female due to the fact that it is
important for a son to continue the family name; many baby girls were
disregarded and left to die.
The poems structure is split into three parts with the use
of asterisks in between stanzas, these act as a barrier or a divide between
cultures; one being the characters old home and the other being her new
adoptive home in America. This split between the two cultures presents the
polar opposites of the two places. In addition to this the number of lines in
each stanza is effected by the split, within the third section each stanza has
exactly three lines for three stanzas where as the last section the number of
lines in each stanza slowly recede. One interpretation of this could be that
the number of lines represents the amount of joy being associated with the
child; in the third section it begins with three stanzas to show the initial
joy of the possibility of the new born being a boy but this declines after they
‘feel for penis or no penis,’, indicating that the joy has been lost as the
baby was not male. Another interpretation is that majority of the action in the
poem being a routine as the majority of the stanzas are organised into three
lines but once again the pause at the line previously mentioned above implies
some form of disruption.
Following the ideas of conflicting cultures above, there are
clear differences within the sections with the use of verbs. The child was
treated as an inanimate object in the first and last section with the use of
detached verbs: ‘stuffed’ ‘ abandoned’ ‘toss’, by using these impersonal
actions the reader is given the impression that the mothers described in the
deliverer have been almost conditioned into having no attachment in regards to
their own baby girls. This contrasts with the verbs used in the middle section:
‘seen or touched’ ‘crying’, these verbs come with more relation to emotions and
sensitivity which is lacked in the surrounding sections. The almost juxtaposing
verbs reinforce the barrier between the west culture and east.
Readers may interpret the voice of this poem to be an
American child talking about their adoptive sister from the line ‘this is the
one my mother will bring’ but it could alternatively be interpreted as the
adopted child talking about herself in third person. This interpretation could
explain the conflict of cultures being a key theme throughout the poem; as if
she feels that she is no longer the child that was thrown away by her
biological mother but also realising her loss of true heritage.
The Deliverer could be compared to ‘To my nine-year-old
self’ as they both show a sense of disconnection with themselves or their past.
Saturday, 27 February 2016
Friday, 26 February 2016
'Giuseppe' - blog entry by Safia & Celine
"Giuseppe"
by Roderick Ford explores the theme of ostracization during times of war and
strife. It explores the dire consequences of discrimination for both the victim
and its perpetrators. Ford uses the metaphor of a mermaid washed up on the
beach to represent the dehumanisation of migrants. Ford explores xenophobia
through his use of imagery that evokes historical examples: "that in
Sicily in World War Two". The reference to the Second World War
foregrounds the theme of ostracization and migration. Ford's use of 'She'
instead of any actual name may show their systematic dehumanisation of her. The
speaker is disgusted by his Uncle Giuseppe's actions, but the ending is
optimistic, "and he could not look me in the eye".
The reference
to plants like "Bourgainvella" which typically grows in places
foreign to Sicily, reflects how communities react positively to migration when
it benefits them.
Rodrick uses the example of WWII with the Nazi slaughtering
of many Jews to bring in a sense of realism, helping the reader to understand
the dreadful aspects being presented in the poem. Moreover, Giuseppe has a
negative tone due to the seriousness of the
poem with words such as ‘captive’ , ‘dry’, ‘cut’, ‘burial ’and ‘starvation’ all having negative connotation
linking to being trapped. The collective use of these words discloses the loss
of humanity in a moment of war, also, the line ‘starvation forgives men many
things’ reflects how instinct are altered when desperation is high and the
outcomes of brutality it produces. Furthermore, the constant contradiction for
example ‘a fish can’t speak’, ‘but she screamed like a woman’, is used
throughout the poem to juxtapose the disgusting actions towards the mermaid with
the approach of the people, to reveal the common theme of human trying to
dehumanize people as a way to justified their killings. Also the smile ‘screamed
like a woman’ further emphasise the contradiction by the mermaid being compared
to a woman. This personifies the mermaid allowing the reader to level with
mermaid and feel sympathetic.
The split in generation highlighted in the Giuseppe shows
how even the actions which occur years ago can leave a long lasting guilt to
linger throughout generation. This link to the atmosphere in post-war Germany,
this consisted of the baby boomers hostility towards ex-Nazi and their mocking
of the ones who were trying to justify or ignore their contributions to such
activates in WWII. This theme is mirrored in Giuseppe ‘couldn’t look me in the
eye’ shows the uncle cannot rationalise his misdoing even with the constant dehumanizing
of the mermaid, for instance, the reference to her never learning to speak,
being simple and just being a fish. In addition, the repetition of the mermaid
not being able to ‘speak’ is significant showing yet again the copying
mechanism of ignoring ones human characteristic is used by human. Additionally,
this reveals how groups or people are made to feel inferior and voiceless so
those apart who are superior don’t identify themselves similar to them by
denying them any humanity, allowing them to become emotionally unattached.
Giuseppe is dominated with free verse for example, in stanza
two ‘me’, ‘two’, aquarium’ and ‘well’ being are an example of the pattern
throughout. This reinforces and strengthens the serious and uncertainty of the
poem, due to the fact it doesn’t follow a more playful rhyme allowing there to
be an impactful message. Moreover, the mermaid being the protagonist of the
poem is symbolic, as she is used to represent those who are treated unfairly
and marginalized. Identity is also made significant because the confusion on
how to address the mermaid is made explicit ‘she, it’, ‘she was only a fish’,
‘like a woman’ and ‘was proof she was just a fish’. Almost reflects to the
reader the uncles uncomfortable tone when sharing the story with the persona,
also, by the poem being in a first person narrative it makes it more believable
and imitate. Making the reader feel like the experience and feeling being told
by the persona directly to them, thus the reader can sympathise with the
message of the poem.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)